Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Randomised trial of the fascia iliaca block versus the '3-in-1' block for femoral neck fractures in the emergency department.

Emergency Medicine Journal(2015)SCI 3区

Academic Department of Emergency Care | Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit | Emergency Department

Cited 40|Views5
Abstract
Femoral neck fractures are a common and painful injury. Femoral nerve blocks, and a variant of this technique termed the '3-in-1' block, are often used in this patient group, but their effect is variable. The fascia iliaca compartment block (FIB) has been proposed as an alternative, but the relative effectiveness of the two techniques in the early stages of care is unknown. We therefore compared the FIB versus the 3-in-1 block in a randomised trial conducted in two UK emergency departments.Parallel, two-group randomised equivalence trial. Consenting patients >18 years with a femoral neck fracture were randomly allocated to receive either a FIB or a 3-in-1 block. The primary outcome was pain measured on a 100 mm visual analogue scale at 60 min. The between-group difference was adjusted for centre, age, sex, fracture type, pre-block analgesia and pre-block pain score.178 patients were randomised and 162 included in the primary analysis. The mean 100 mm visual analogue pain scale score at 60 min was 38 mm in the FIB arm and 35 mm in the 3-in-1 arm. The adjusted difference between the arms was 3 mm, with a 95% CI (-4.7 to 10.8) that excluded a clinically important difference between the two interventions.FIB is equivalent to the 3-in-1 block for immediate pain relief in adult neck of femur fractures.ISRCTN16152419.
More
Translated text
Key words
anaesthesia,analgesia/pain control,fractures and dislocations
求助PDF
上传PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Upload PDF to Generate Summary
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
KH Todd, KG Funk, JP Funk, R Bonacci
1996

被引用1052 | 浏览

D Blackford, P Westhoffen
2009

被引用35 | 浏览

Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:本文通过随机试验比较了腹股沟筋膜阻滞(FIB)与传统的“3-in-1”阻滞对于股骨颈骨折早期疼痛缓解的效果,发现两种方法在疼痛缓解上等效。

方法】:研究采用了平行两组的随机等效试验设计,将同意参与研究的18岁以上股骨颈骨折患者随机分配接受FIB或“3-in-1”阻滞。

实验】:共178名患者被随机分配,其中162名纳入主要分析。在60分钟后,FIB组的平均视觉模拟疼痛评分是38毫米,“3-in-1”组的平均评分是35毫米。调整后的组间差异为3毫米,95%置信区间为(-4.7到10.8),表明两种干预措施之间没有临床重要差异。实验使用的数据集未在文本中明确提及。