Evaluation of Multimodal Segmentation Based on 3D T1-, T2- and FLAIR-weighted Images – the Difficulty of Choosing
NeuroImage(2017)
Dept. of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology | Neurology and Epileptology
Abstract
Voxel-based morphometry is still mainly based on T1-weighted MRI scans. Misclassification of vessels and dura mater as gray matter has been previously reported. Goal of the present work was to evaluate the effect of multimodal segmentation methods available in SPM12, and their influence on identification of age related atrophy and lesion detection in epilepsy patients. 3D T1-, T2- and FLAIR-images of 77 healthy adults (mean age 35.8 years, 19-66 years, 45 females), 7 patients with malformation of cortical development (MCD) (mean age 28.1 years,19-40 years, 3 females), and 5 patients with left hippocampal sclerosis (LHS) (mean age 49.0 years, 25-67 years, 3 females) from a 3 T scanner were evaluated. Segmentation based on T1-only, T1+T2, T1+FLAIR, T2+FLAIR, and T1+T2+FLAIR were compared in the healthy subjects. Clinical VBM results based on the different segmentation approaches for MCD and for LHS were compared. T1-only segmentation overestimated total intracranial volume by about 80 ml compared to the other segmentation methods. This was due to misclassification of dura mater and vessels as GM and CSF. Significant differences were found for several anatomical regions: the occipital lobe, the basal ganglia/thalamus, the pre- and postcentral gyrus, the cerebellum, and the brainstem. None of the segmentation methods yielded completely satisfying results for the basal ganglia/thalamus and the brainstem. The best correlation with age could be found for the multimodal T1+T2+FLAIR segmentation. Highest T-scores for identification of LHS were found for T1+T2 segmentation, while highest T-scores for MCD were dependent on lesion and anatomical location. Multimodal segmentation is superior to T1-only segmentation and reduces the misclassification of dura mater and vessels as GM and CSF. Depending on the anatomical region and the pathology of interest (atrophy, lesion detection, etc.), different combinations of T1, T2 and FLAIR yield optimal results.
MoreTranslated text
Key words
Automatic lesion detection,Epilepsy,Atrophy,Statistical parametric mapping
PDF
View via Publisher
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example

Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
2004
被引用724 | 浏览
2011
被引用28 | 浏览
2005
被引用59 | 浏览
2002
被引用433 | 浏览
2012
被引用174 | 浏览
2014
被引用234 | 浏览
2010
被引用67 | 浏览
2011
被引用1138 | 浏览
2012
被引用367 | 浏览
2001
被引用293 | 浏览
2013
被引用41 | 浏览
2013
被引用59 | 浏览
2014
被引用376 | 浏览
2015
被引用395 | 浏览
2016
被引用101 | 浏览
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper
GPU is busy, summary generation fails
Rerequest