WeChat Mini Program
Old Version Features

    • Opth_a_215144 2003..2015

    Hon Shing Ong,Mohamed Farook, Benjamin Boon Chuan Tan,Geraint P Williams,Marcony R Santhiago, Jodhbir S. Mehta

    semanticscholar（2019）

    Cited 0|Views14
    Abstract
    Hon Shing Ong 1–3 Mohamed Farook 1 Benjamin Boon Chuan Tan 1 Geraint P Williams Marcony R Santhiago Jodhbir S Mehta 1Department of Corneal and External Diseases, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore; 2Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore; 3SingHealth Duke-NUS Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore; 4Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 5Department of Ophthalmology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil; 6School of Material Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore Purpose: A percentage tissue altered (PTA) score of ≥40% has been advocated as an independent indicator of post-operative ectasia risk following laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK). This study was performed to test the hypothesis that refractive procedures, such as laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) or small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), may alter the range of PTA, within which refractive corneal surgery can be safely performed. Setting: Refractive department, tertiary ophthalmic hospital. Design: Retrospective observational study. Methods: Review of case notes was performed for patients who presented for refractive surgeries, other than LASIK. To determine the risk of corneal ectasia for each patient prior to refractive surgery, we estimated what each patient’s PTA would have been if they had undergone LASIK. The Randleman Ectasia Risk Score System (ERSS) was also calculated. Results: 114 eyes (66 patients) were included. 94 eyes underwent SMILE. 20 eyes underwent LASEK. A significant proportion of eyes had PTA ≥40% – SMILE eyes: up to 31.9%, LASEK eyes: up to 60.0% (at presumed LASIK flap of 120 μm). The maximum calculated PTAwas up to 47.9% in the SMILE group and up to 51.5% in the LASEK group. Using ERSS, 12.8–16% of SMILE eyes and 15.0–80.0% of LASEK eyes would have been considered to have moderate-tohigh ectasia risk. No post-surgical ectasia was observed at 3 years. Conclusion: SMILE and LASEK alter the range of PTA, within which corneal refractive surgery may be performed with a lower risk of developing post-operative corneal ectasia; a safe PTA threshold needs to be determined for these procedures before recommendations for clinical practice can be made.
    More
    Translated text
    求助PDF
    上传PDF
    Bibtex
    AI Read Science
    AI Summary
    AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
    Example
    Background
    Key content
    Introduction
    Methods
    Results
    Related work
    Fund
    Key content
    • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
    • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
    • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
    • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
    • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
    Upload PDF to Generate Summary
    Must-Reading Tree
    Example
    Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
    Data Disclaimer
    The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
    Chat Paper
    Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined