Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Clonal Phylogenies Inferred from Bulk, Single Cell, and Spatial Transcriptomic Analysis of Epithelial Cancers

PLoS ONE(2025)SCI 3区

Univ Oxford

Cited 0|Views47
Abstract
Epithelial cancers are typically heterogeneous with primary prostate cancer being a typical example of histological and genomic variation. Prior studies of primary prostate cancer tumour genetics revealed extensive inter and intra-patient genomic tumour heterogeneity. Recent advances in machine learning have enabled the inference of ground-truth genomic single-nucleotide and copy number variant status from transcript data. While these inferred SNV and CNV states can be used to resolve clonal phylogenies, however, it is still unknown how faithfully transcript-based tumour phylogenies reconstruct ground truth DNA-based tumour phylogenies. We sought to study the accuracy of inferred-transcript to recapitulate DNA-based tumour phylogenies. We first performed in-silico comparisons of inferred and directly resolved SNV and CNV status, from single cancer cells, from three different cell lines. We found that inferred SNV phylogenies accurately recapitulate DNA phylogenies (entanglement = 0.097). We observed similar results in iCNV and CNV based phylogenies (entanglement = 0.11). Analysis of published prostate cancer DNA phylogenies and inferred CNV, SNV and transcript based phylogenies demonstrated phylogenetic concordance. Finally, a comparison of pseudo-bulked spatial transcriptomic data to adjacent sections with WGS data also demonstrated recapitulation of ground truth (entanglement = 0.35). These results suggest that transcript-based inferred phylogenies recapitulate conventional genomic phylogenies. Further work will need to be done to increase accuracy, genomic, and spatial resolution.
More
Translated text
Key words
Intratumor Heterogeneity,Cancer Genomics,Tumor Evolution,Spatial Profiling,Cell Heterogeneity
PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Try using models to generate summary,it takes about 60s
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
FS Collins, ES Lander, J Rogers,RH Waterston
2004

被引用4606 | 浏览

2010

被引用2036 | 浏览

Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:研究转录组数据推断的克隆谱系在重建DNA基础上的肿瘤谱系的准确性,发现转录组推断的谱系能够可靠地反映DNA谱系。

方法】:通过机器学习技术从转录数据推断单核苷酸变异(SNV)和拷贝数变异(CNV)状态,并与直接从单细胞数据解析的SNV和CNV状态进行对比。

实验】:在三个不同细胞系中进行了in-silico比较,并分析了已发表的前列腺癌DNA谱系与推断的CNV、SNV及转录组谱系的比对,同时对比了伪集成的空间转录组数据与相邻切片的全基因组测序(WGS)数据,使用的数据集未在文中明确提及。结果显示,转录组推断的谱系与DNA谱系具有一致性(SNV谱系entanglement = 0.097,CNV谱系entanglement = 0.11,空间转录组数据与WGS数据entanglement = 0.35)。