Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Nebular Spectra from Type Ia Supernova Explosion Models Compared to JWST Observations of SN 2021Aefx

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS(2023)

Aix Marseille Univ | Sorbonne Univ | Univ Pittsburgh | Queens Univ Belfast | UCL

Cited 10|Views25
Abstract
Context. Recent JWST observations of the Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) 2021aefx in the nebular phase have paved the way for late-time studies covering the full optical to mid-infrared (MIR) wavelength range, and with it the hope to better constrain SN Ia explosion mechanisms. Aims. We investigate whether public SN Ia models covering a broad range of progenitor scenarios and explosion mechanisms (Chandrasekhar-mass, or M-Ch, delayed detonations, pulsationally assisted gravitationally confined detonations, sub-M-Ch double detonations, and violent mergers) can reproduce the full optical-MIR spectrum of SN 2021aefx at similar to 270 days post explosion. Methods. We consider spherically averaged 3D models available from the Heidelberg Supernova Model Archive with a Ni-56 yield in the range 0.5-0.8 M-circle dot. We performed 1D steady-state non-local thermodynamic equilibrium simulations with the radiative-transfer code CMFGEN, and compared the predicted spectra to SN 2021aefx. Results. The models can explain the main features of SN 2021aefx over the full wavelength range. However, no single model, or mechanism, emerges as a preferred match, and the predicted spectra are similar to each other despite the very different explosion mechanisms. We discuss possible causes for the mismatch of the models, including ejecta asymmetries and ionisation effects. Our new calculations of the collisional strengths for NiIII have a major impact on the two prominent lines at 7.35 mu m and 11.00 mu m, and highlight the need for more accurate collisional data for forbidden transitions. Using updated atomic data, we identify a strong feature due to [CaIV] 3.21 mu m, attributed to [NiI] in previous studies. We also provide a tentative identification of a forbidden line due to [NeII] 12.81 mu m, whose peaked profile indicates the presence of neon all the way to the innermost region of the ejecta, as predicted for instance in violent merger models. Contrary to previous claims, we show that the [ArIII] 8.99 mu m line can be broader in sub-M-Ch models compared to near-M-Ch models. Last, the total luminosity in lines of Ni is found to correlate strongly with the stable nickel yield, although ionisation effects can bias the inferred abundance. Conclusions. Our models suggest that key physical ingredients are missing from either the explosion models, or the radiative-transfer post-processing, or both. Nonetheless, they also show the potential of the near- and MIR to uncover new spectroscopic diagnostics of SN Ia explosion mechanisms.
More
Translated text
Key words
Type Ia Supernovae
PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:该论文研究了是否能用涵盖不同爆炸机制和双星系统的超新星模型来解释SN 2021aefx在光学到中红外波段的全光谱,并指出现有模型中可能缺失的关键物理因素。

方法】:研究使用了3D模型和1D非局部热力学平衡模拟,结合辐射传输代码CMFGEN,预测了模型光谱并和观测到的SN 2021aefx光谱进行了对比。

实验】:实验使用的是Heidelberg超新星模型档案中的平均球形模型,并考虑了Ni-56产物的范围在0.5-0.8 M☉。结果显示,模型能解释SN 2021aefx的主要光谱特征,但无法确定一个单独的最优模型或机制,且预测的光谱尽管基于不同的爆炸机制,却相似。发现了碰撞强度计算对NiIII的重要影响,并指出了需要更精确的碰撞数据。