Electronic Health Record (EHR) and Genomics-Based Machine Learning (ML) to Predict Therapeutic Effectiveness among Patients with Hormone-Receptor Positive (hr)+/her2advanced Breast Cancer (Abc)
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY(2023)
Concert Pharmaceuticals (United States) | University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
e13574 Background: Patients (pts) with HR+/HER2- aBC may eventually become resistant to endocrine therapies and CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). ML algorithms on EHR linked with NGS data may enable more accurate predictions of therapeutic resistance and identify clinicogenomic (CG) risk factors. Methods: HR+/HER2- aBC pts treated between Jan 2015 – Dec 2022 with at least one NGS test report before line end were identified in ConcertAI’s Genome360 oncology database, consisting of molecular alterations abstracted from NGS reports linked with deeply curated US-based EHR. XGBoost (XGB) and Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH) models were trained to predict real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) derived from curated tumor progression (TP), as assessed by the providers based on clinical observations, pathology results, and radiologic evidence. Data was split into 60:20:20 for training/validation/test. Pts in the 1st and 4th quartiles of predicted risk from XGB model were defined as low- and high-risk. Predictors were identified from Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-derived marginal hazard ratios (HR), derived in the 180 days prior to index date, and included demographics, labs, vitals, comorbidities, concomitant medications, procedures, tumor properties, and molecular alterations as features. Results: Among 624 pts (CDK4/6i treated = 519) with median age = 62.5 years and 10.5% black, 46.8% developed TP. The test cumulative dynamic ROC-AUC in the best-performing XGB model was 0.68. The precision at 180 days (%TP = 27) was 40%. The 180-day cumulative incidence of TP in low- and high-risk groups was 11.6% vs 37.7%. Higher line number, lower hemoglobin (HGB), higher alkaline phosphatase (ALP), presence of liver metastasis, and history of thoracic radiation were clinical risk factors. Genomic risk factors were FGF aberrations, alterations in TP53 and in genes within the MAPK, cell cycle, and ESR pathways, and co-alterations in the PIK3CA+TP53, and MAPK+ESR pathways. ALP-by-TP53 interaction was found. ALP level was a risk factor in TP53-wildtype (wt) but not in TP53-mutant (mut) pts. Conclusions: ML on EHR linked with NGS data enables identification of high-risk pts and multimodal predictors of CDK4/6i resistance among women with HR+/HER2- aBC, identifying both known and undescribed interactions between clinical and genomic risk factors as well as co-alteration risk factors. [Table: see text]
MoreTranslated text
求助PDF
上传PDF
View via Publisher
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
- Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
- We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
- We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
- The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
- Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Upload PDF to Generate Summary
Must-Reading Tree
Example

Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper