Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

External Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Automated Echocardiographic Strain Measurements

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL - DIGITAL HEALTH(2024)

Akershus Univ Hosp | Mackay Mem Hosp | Us2 Ai | Natl Heart Ctr | Natl Cerebral & Cardiovasc Ctr | Univ Gothenburg | Univ Turku | Karolinska Univ Hosp | Northwestern Univ | AstraZeneca (Sweden) | Ribocure Pharmaceut AB Ribo Life Sci Co Ltd

Cited 0|Views9
Abstract
Aims Echocardiographic strain imaging reflects myocardial deformation and is a sensitive measure of cardiac function and wall-motion abnormalities. Deep learning (DL) algorithms could automate the interpretation of echocardiographic strain imaging.Methods and results We developed and trained an automated DL-based algorithm for left ventricular (LV) strain measurements in an internal dataset. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was validated externally in (i) a real-world Taiwanese cohort of participants with and without heart failure (HF), (ii) a core-lab measured dataset from the multinational prevalence of microvascular dysfunction-HF and preserved ejection fraction (PROMIS-HFpEF) study, and regional strain in (iii) the HMC-QU-MI study of patients with suspected myocardial infarction. Outcomes included measures of agreement [bias, mean absolute difference (MAD), root-mean-squared-error (RMSE), and Pearson's correlation (R)] and area under the curve (AUC) to identify HF and regional wall-motion abnormalities. The DL workflow successfully analysed 3741 (89%) studies in the Taiwanese cohort, 176 (96%) in PROMIS-HFpEF, and 158 (98%) in HMC-QU-MI. Automated GLS showed good agreement with manual measurements (mean +/- SD): -18.9 +/- 4.5% vs. -18.2 +/- 4.4%, respectively, bias 0.68 +/- 2.52%, MAD 2.0 +/- 1.67, RMSE = 2.61, R = 0.84 in the Taiwanese cohort; and -15.4 +/- 4.1% vs. -15.9 +/- 3.6%, respectively, bias -0.65 +/- 2.71%, MAD 2.19 +/- 1.71, RMSE = 2.78, R = 0.76 in PROMIS-HFpEF. In the Taiwanese cohort, automated GLS accurately identified patients with HF (AUC = 0.89 for total HF and AUC = 0.98 for HF with reduced ejection fraction). In HMC-QU-MI, automated regional strain identified regional wall-motion abnormalities with an average AUC = 0.80.Conclusion DL algorithms can interpret echocardiographic strain images with similar accuracy as conventional measurements. These results highlight the potential of DL algorithms to democratize the use of cardiac strain measurements and reduce time-spent and costs for echo labs globally. Graphical Abstract
More
Translated text
Key words
Deep learning,Echocardiography,Strain,Global longitudinal strain,Heart failure,Artificial intelligence
求助PDF
上传PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Upload PDF to Generate Summary
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:本文验证了一种深度学习算法在自动分析心脏超声应变测量方面的准确性,该算法在诊断心脏功能和壁运动异常方面具有显著效果。

方法】:研究开发并训练了一种基于深度学习的自动算法,用于左心室(LV)应变测量,并在内部数据集上进行训练。

实验】:算法在外部数据集上的验证包括:(i) 台湾真实世界的心衰与否参与者队列,(ii) 国际多中心PROMIS-HFpEF研究的核心实验室测量数据集,以及(iii) HMC-QU-MI研究中疑似心肌梗死患者的区域应变。实验结果包括一致性指标(偏倚、平均绝对差异、均方根误差、皮尔逊相关系数)和识别心衰及区域壁运动异常的曲线下面积(AUC)。在台湾队列中,算法成功分析了89%的研究,在PROMIS-HFpEF中成功分析了96%,在HMC-QU-MI中成功分析了98%。自动全局纵向应变(GLS)与手动测量的一致性良好,在台湾队列中AUC达到0.89,在HMC-QU-MI研究中区域应变识别壁运动异常的平均AUC为0.80。