WeChat Mini Program
Old Version Features

Frequency and Classification of Addenda in Paediatric Neuroradiological Reports As Part of Quality Assurance

S. S. B. Venkatakrishna,A. Ghosh, P. Sharma, M. Miranda-Schaeubinger, A. V. Prakash, L. Addisu,R. W. Sze,S. Andronikou

Clinical Radiology(2024)

Childrens Hosp Philadelphia

Cited 0|Views5
Abstract
AIM: To determine the frequency and classification of addenda seen in paediatric brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of the addenda of brain MRI reports from a large tertiary children's hospital was undertaken between January 2013 to December 2021 and a subset of above radiology reports was used to classify addenda over 6 -month periods, October to March, spanning 2018 to 2021. A radiology fellow and a medical doctor classified the addenda into previously published categories using their best judgement. RESULTS: Out of 73,643 brain MRI reports over 9 years (108 months) included in the study, only 923 reports (1.25%) had addenda. There was a total of 13,615 brain MRI reports from 6month periods, of which only 179 reports (1.31%) had an addendum. The number of errors according to categories were: observational 88/13,615 (0.65%); interpretational 16/13,615 (0.12%); non -observational and non -interpretative 82/13,615 (0.6%). Notifications to referring physician made in 29/13,615 (0.21%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall proportion of addenda to the brain MRI reports of children in the present study was low, at 1.25%. Categorisation of different addenda revealed the most common errors to be observational in 0.65%, including under -reading in the region of interest in 0.25%. Appropriate measures can now be introduced to minimise the error -based addenda further and improve MRI diagnosis in children. Other paediatric practices may choose to follow suit in evaluating their addenda and errors to improve practice. (c) 2024 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
More
Translated text
Key words
Addendum,Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI),Radiology Report,Errors
求助PDF
上传PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Upload PDF to Generate Summary
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:本文研究了儿童脑部MRI报告中附加条款的发生频率和分类,发现附加条款比例较低,并提出相应措施以减少基于错误的附加条款,提高诊断质量。

方法】:通过回顾性分析一家大型三级儿童医院2013年至2021年间脑部MRI报告的附加条款,并使用之前公布的分类方法进行分类。

实验】:在9年的研究期间(共73,643份脑部MRI报告),仅1.25%的报告包含附加条款。在特定6个月期间(13,615份报告)中,1.31%的报告包含附加条款。通过分类发现,观测性错误最为常见(0.65%),其中兴趣区域下的读数不足占0.25%。