Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Application of the Delphi Method to the Development of Common Data Elements for Social Drivers of Health: A Systematic Scoping Review

Yulia A. Levites Strekalova, July D. Nelson, Haley M. Weber, Xiangren Wang, Sara M. Midence

Translational Behavioral Medicine(2024)

UF Coll Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess | Department of Health Services Research

Cited 1|Views5
Abstract
Collaborative data science requires standardized, harmonized, interoperable, and ethically sourced data. Developing an agreed-upon set of elements requires capturing different perspectives on the importance and feasibility of the data elements through a consensus development approach. This study reports on the systematic scoping review of literature that examined the inclusion of diverse stakeholder groups and sources of social drivers of health variables in consensus-based common data element (CDE) sets. This systematic scoping review included sources from PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, WoS MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases. Extracted data included the stakeholder groups engaged in the Delphi process, sources of CDE sets, and inclusion of social drivers data across 11 individual and 6 social domains. Of the 384 studies matching the search string, 22 were included in the final review. All studies involved experts with healthcare expertise directly relevant to the developed CDE set, and only six (27%) studies engaged health consumers. Literature reviews and expert input were the most frequent sources of CDE sets. Seven studies (32%) did not report the inclusion of any demographic variables in the CDE sets, and each demographic SDoH domain was included in at least one study with age and sex assigned at birth included in all studies, and social driver domains included only in four studies (18%). The Delphi technique engages diverse expert groups around the development of SDoH data elements. Future studies can benefit by involving health consumers as experts.
More
Translated text
Key words
common data elements,Delphi technique,PhenX core collection,social drivers of health,stakeholder engagement
求助PDF
上传PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Upload PDF to Generate Summary
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:本研究通过系统范围综述探讨了在基于共识的通用数据元素(CDE)集中纳入不同利益相关者群体和社会健康驱动因素变量的情况,提出德尔菲法在发展社会健康驱动因素CDEs中的应用。

方法】:研究采用系统范围综述方法,对PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、WoS MEDLINE和PsycINFO数据库的文献进行了检索和分析。

实验】:共检索到384项研究,最终纳入22项进行综述,发现大多数研究涉及具有医疗专业知识的专家,仅有27%的研究包含了健康消费者,文献综述和专家输入是CDE集的最常见来源;研究显示在CDE集中对人口统计变量的包含不足,社会驱动因素领域仅在4项研究中被纳入。