Challenges of Rotational Ground Motion Measurements in the Local Distance Range

Since almost two decades, there is a fast and steady progress in understanding the rotational part of the seismic wavefield and exploring possible applications. These achievements are based on studies using simulated data, array-derived measurements, and direct measurements of large (M > 5), teleseismic earthquakes by ringlasers. Since only a couple of years, direct measurements of smaller (M < 3) earthquakes in the local distance range are also feasible. This was made possible due to new instrumentation developments such as portable rotation sensors. From experience with translational measurements, seismology has developed a relatively simple description of the seismic wavefield, as long as the observation is recorded in the source far-field, and site-effects at the point of observation can be neglected by choosing an appropriate frequency range for the analysis. Within the NonDC-BoVo project two portable rotational sensors have been installed in the Vogtland/West-Bohemia earthquake swarm region with the goal to incorporate the rotational waveform data into the inversion for seismic moment tensors. Both sensors are located in an epicentral distance of ~10 km to the center of the swarm activity. So far, we have recorded 197 events with ML ≥ 1 and 6 events with ML ≥ 2.5. Although we are positively surprised how well we can record rotational ground motion of earthquakes with even very small magnitudes, we encountered challenges in the details of the waveform recordings. At the sensor location in Landwüst (D) we recorded events down to ML ~ 0.5 with good signal-to-noise ratio in a frequency range of 5 to 25 Hz. At the second location in Skalna (CZ) the signal-to-noise ratio is worse and we recorded earthquakes only with ML ≥ 1.5. Relocating the sensor to Wernitzgrün (D), about 25 km to the North of Skalna, did not improve the quality of the waveform recordings. Technical issues with the sensor can be ruled out for both locations. Here, we want to present details of the challenges with the rotational ground motion data from these small and local earthquake recordings. First analyses hint to a much stronger effect of local site conditions onto rotational than translational ground motion data. In addition, with the above-mentioned setting, we have to consider the complexities of the near-field part of the wavefield as well. With our contribution we aim to add another aspect to the understanding of the rotational wavefield.