Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

DPYD Genotype Should Be Extended to Rare Variants: Report on Two Cases of Phenotype / Genotype Discrepancy.

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology(2025)

Hôpital Saint-Louis | Institut Universitaire du Cancer and Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse

Cited 0|Views0
Abstract
The enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is the primary catabolic pathway of fluoropyrimidines including 5 fluorouracil (5FU) and capecitabine. Cases of lethal toxicity have been reported in cancer patients with complete DPD deficiency receiving standard dose of 5FU or capecitabine. DPD is encoded by the pharmacogene DPYD in which more than 200 variants have been identified. Different approaches have been developed for screening DPD-deficiency, including DPYD genotyping and phenotyping. Plasma uracil ([U]) and dihydrouracil ([UH2]) concentrations are routinely used as surrogate markers for systemic DPD activity: [U] ≥ 16 ng/ml and < 150 ng/ml, and [U] ≥ 150 ng/mL indicate partial and complete DPD deficient phenotype, respectively, while values of 5 or 10 for [UH2]/([U] ratio are often cited. Four clinically relevant DPYD defective variants (DPYD*13, DPYD*2A, p.Asp949Val and haplotype B3), are targeted in genetic testing via PCR. In practice, pretreatment [U], alone or combined with these 4 recommended DPYD alleles guides individual dosage selection, though this approach has limitations. This is illustrated by two cases showing discrepancy between DPD deficient phenotype and normal standard genotype. In these two cases, DPYD exome sequencing with Next Generation Sequencing identified rare inactive variants, establishing concordance between phenotype and genotype. In patient 1, [U] levels of 21.1 and 25.5 ng/mL, indicated partial deficiency though the targeted genotype was normal and 5FU dose was adjusted based on the phenotype. In patient 2, [U] levels of 16.2 and 15.2 ng/mL were near the 16 ng/ml threshold. With a normal genotype, he as considered non-deficient as targeted genotype was normal and the standard dose was administered. These two cases underscore the need to pair DPD phenotyping with whole DPYD gene sequencing, due to the frequent discrepancies between these pharmacogenetic tools, the burden of rare variants and ethnic differences in variant frequencies.
More
Translated text
Key words
(3–10): dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase,uracil,phenotype,genotype,pharmacogene,rare variant,gene sequencing
求助PDF
上传PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Upload PDF to Generate Summary
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:论文提出DPYD基因型检测应扩展至罕见变异,以解决基因型与表型不符的问题,通过两个案例说明全基因测序在确定DPD缺乏表型中的重要性。

方法】:使用DPYD基因分型和表型检测方法,包括DPYD13、DPYD2A、p.Asp949Val和haplotype B3等四个关键变异的PCR检测以及血浆尿嘧啶([U])和二氢尿嘧啶([UH2])浓度比值作为DPD活性的替代指标。

实验】:通过两个案例研究,使用Next Generation Sequencing对DPYD基因进行全外显子测序,发现罕见非活性变异,并调整5FU剂量。第一个患者[U]水平为21.1和25.5 ng/mL,表明部分缺乏,尽管靶向基因型正常。第二个患者[U]水平为16.2和15.2 ng/mL,接近16 ng/mL阈值,基因型正常,因此被判定为非缺乏并给予标准剂量。实验结果强调全DPYD基因测序的必要性。