WeChat Mini Program
Old Version Features

Comparing Immunotherapy Effectiveness for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Infiltrative Versus Non-Infiltrative Types in Real-World Settings

THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY(2025)

Natl Cheng Kung Univ

Cited 0|Views6
Abstract
Background: Infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often associated with an unfavorable prognosis, posing a challenge in determining the optimal therapeutic approach. Immunotherapy, employing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has become a preferred first-line treatment for advanced HCC. However, the overall effectiveness of ICIs in patients with infiltrative HCC remains unclear. This study aims to compare the effect of ICI treatment on clinical outcomes between patients with infiltrative and non-infiltrative HCC. Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort consisting of unresectable HCC patients who underwent immunotherapy with ICIs, categorized into infiltrative and non-infiltrative groups was studied. Primary outcomes comprised treatment response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 198 patients, 60 (30.3%) had infiltrative HCC, while 138 (69.7%) had non-infiltrative HCC. In the infiltrative group, the objective response rate (ORR) was 36.7% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 55.0%. For the non-infiltrative group, the ORR was 33.3% and the DCR was 56.5%, showing no significant difference between the two groups. However, patients in the infiltrative group had significantly shorter median of PFS and OS following immunotherapy, with a PFS of 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.5–6.7; p = 0.0409) and an OS of 10.4 months (95% CI: 6.7–14.4; p = 0.0268), compared with the non-infiltrative group, which had a PFS of 5.5 months (95% CI: 3.2–7.6) and an OS of 17.0 months (95% CI: 12.8–21.8). Conclusion: For immunotherapy, infiltrative HCC exhibits treatment responses similar to non-infiltrative HCC. Nonetheless, infiltrative HCC is associated with shorter survival outcomes, compared with non-infiltrative type. Our findings emphasize the essential of considering type discrepancies when developing management strategies for immunotherapy.
More
Translated text
Key words
hepatocellular carcinoma,immune checkpoint inhibitors,infiltrative tumor morphology
求助PDF
上传PDF
Bibtex
AI Read Science
AI Summary
AI Summary is the key point extracted automatically understanding the full text of the paper, including the background, methods, results, conclusions, icons and other key content, so that you can get the outline of the paper at a glance.
Example
Background
Key content
Introduction
Methods
Results
Related work
Fund
Key content
  • Pretraining has recently greatly promoted the development of natural language processing (NLP)
  • We show that M6 outperforms the baselines in multimodal downstream tasks, and the large M6 with 10 parameters can reach a better performance
  • We propose a method called M6 that is able to process information of multiple modalities and perform both single-modal and cross-modal understanding and generation
  • The model is scaled to large model with 10 billion parameters with sophisticated deployment, and the 10 -parameter M6-large is the largest pretrained model in Chinese
  • Experimental results show that our proposed M6 outperforms the baseline in a number of downstream tasks concerning both single modality and multiple modalities We will continue the pretraining of extremely large models by increasing data to explore the limit of its performance
Upload PDF to Generate Summary
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
European Association for the Study of the Liver
2018

被引用1735 | 浏览

Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper

要点】:该研究比较了免疫疗法在浸润性肝细胞癌和非浸润性肝细胞癌患者中的临床效果,发现虽然两组的治疗响应率相似,但浸润性肝细胞癌患者的无进展生存期和总生存期较短。

方法】:通过回顾性队列研究,将198名接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的不可切除肝细胞癌患者分为浸润性和非浸润性两组,比较两组的治疗响应率、无进展生存期和总生存期。

实验】:在198名患者中,浸润性肝细胞癌患者60名,非浸润性肝细胞癌患者138名。结果显示,浸润性组客观响应率为36.7%,疾病控制率为55.0%;非浸润性组客观响应率为33.3%,疾病控制率为56.5%。使用的数据集未在文中明确提及。